Architects Go on the Offensive to Save Dallas City Hall

Share News:

Is City Hall falling apart?

It should be no surprise that architects and those who appreciate architecture are at the forefront of the fight to save Dallas City Hall.

They’ve been doing what they can to make the case for keeping 1500 Marilla St., including pushing back on the narrative that the decades-old I.M. Pei is suffering from serious structural problems that would cost hundreds of millions of dollars to repair.

A video published by Save Dallas City Hall, for instance, has Zaida Basora, executive director of AIA Dallas, and other architects countering the very large figures being thrown around by officials and local media.

“It’s not a defensible proposal to think that the city has to abandon City Hall to move into probably an equally old building downtown,” Basora said, claiming repairs could be as low as $10-30 million.

Some developers and former city officials, however, have pushed back on such assertions, claiming that the architects’ assessment is downplaying serious functionality issues with critical systems, according to The Dallas Morning News. Water infiltration and recurring plumbing issues are just two of the nagging problems City Hall’s been dealing with.

The purported price tag of restoring 1500 Marilla St. isn’t the only factor out there in the public discourse. Many believe the Dallas Mavericks are looking hard at the site for a new arena and sports-focused district, but a group of Dallas architects — all of whom were at one point or another a president of a national, state, or local AIA body — have pointed to other potential locations downtown where such a project would be feasible.

“City Hall and Plaza should remain as an iconic civic and employment anchor in the southern CBD, working in conjunction with new development,” the architects asserted.

The Dallas Architecture Forum and Dallas Institute for Humanities and Culture are putting on a public event to discuss the future of 1500 Marilla St. at J. Erik Jonsson Central Library next Thursday (Jan. 22) at 6:30 p.m. Speakers will include Robert Meckfessel, FAIA of DSGN Associates; J.H. Cullum Clark of the George W. Bush Institute; and Institute for Humanities and Culture director Seemee Ali.

Nate Eudaly
Nate Eudaly

Nate Eudaly, executive director of the Dallas Architecture Forum, said organizers reached out to invite someone from the city to attend and provide an overview of the process being undertaken but they declined the invitation.

“It’s disturbing that there seems to be a major lack of transparency on the part of the city to discuss these things,” he said.

The Dallas Economic Development Corporation has been tasked with assessing the structural condition of City Hall. Infrastructure consulting firm AECOM is helping them out. Solicitations have also gone out to commercial property owners downtown for occupancy proposals. Findings will be presented to the Finance Committee in February. 

Eudaly said that the city’s reputation would suffer if it decided to relocate its operations, possibly across different sites.

“It destroys the whole concept of having a city center, a place where the civic government is housed, where people know they can come to gather for meetings, for protests, for celebrations,” he said.

Like others who would like to see City Hall remain at 1500 Marilla St., Eudaly said everything seems rushed, undermining the credibility of officials who maintain the city is doing its due diligence.

“The building is not in danger of falling down. It has some water leaks. It needs some HVAC updates. But it’s not a structurally impaired building … it can be renovated and restored,” he said, noting that the city owns 1500 Marilla St. free and clear. “That’s another important factor that hopefully [the city’s] analysis will at least address in some objective fashion. Those facts need to be analyzed objectively and comprehensively.”

UPDATE: This article was updated at 2:42 p.m. on January 16, 2026, to correct the speakers list for the Dallas Architecture Forum event.

6 Comments

  1. Pat Sinnott on January 16, 2026 at 1:24 pm

    We had enough money to build designer bridges but can’t restore a designer city hall?

    Im not buying that. There are some rich and powerful interests pushing this for their own bottom lines.

  2. Pierce Ables on January 16, 2026 at 4:45 pm

    Deliberate deferred maintenance. City hall’s dysfunction is not due to the building, it’s due to the private interests of our city council.

  3. Dolores Serroka on January 16, 2026 at 5:23 pm

    I’m not an architect but that doesn’t mean I don’t have an appreciation for important structures in Dallas. I appreciate City Hall for all that it represents!

    Putting forth dubious reasons and seemingly inflated maintenance/restoration costs to justify abandoning City Hall Just because someone wants the land does not instill confidence in our city planners, city manager and council.

    Save Dallas City Hall

  4. Kevin Lewis on January 16, 2026 at 5:33 pm

    I’d like to hear estimates on what it’d cost to modernize the building as well, not just repair it. Especially stuff like telecom access… when a section rearranges and adds people, there usually aren’t enough ethernet jacks available for hardwired access. Wi-fi would be a fine alternative, except the wifi in the building (both the private network and the public one) are atrocious especially for large files. Improving the bathrooms would be nice as well, they’re not well ventilated and open to the public so they get pretty gnarly halfway through the day. Elevators are a mess, need a better dispatching system.

    I’m not really married to the building itself, but it’d be nice if the city actually brought our working environment into the 21st century whether we stay or go.

  5. Debbie on January 16, 2026 at 8:33 pm

    Designed by one of the world’s preeminent architects and we’re gonna tear it down? So glad the Guggenheim isn’t in Dallas.

  6. Raymond Crawford on January 20, 2026 at 6:31 pm

    Site C on the far right has already been purchased in 2024 by Hoque Global for the $3 Billion NewPark project.

Leave a Comment