I admit that I have to stifle a laugh when people call Dallas City Hall old. After years growing up in Europe and Asia, I know old architecture. America is a young country, and Dallas is a young city, so calling our city hall old lacks context. Let’s look around at just a few examples from a long list.
Palazzo Senatorio has been Rome’s municipal seat since 1143. It was rebuilt in the Middle Ages, redesigned by Michelangelo in the 16th century, and renovated again in the 19th century. It has always been maintained and used by the city government.
Lübeck Town Hall courtesy of Wikimedia Commons: Jorge Franganillo
Lübeck Town Hall in Germany still serves as the headquarters and meeting place for the city parliament. It’s 800 years old and is a UNESCO World Heritage site.
Bruges City Hall photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons, Marc Ryckaert
Bruges City Hall was constructed in 1376. It is still the active seat of local government. And talk about a cool city council chamber, meetings are held in the Gothic Hall!
That’s Europe, where historic buildings are more widely revered. Shifting focus to our own country, America also has its share of historic government buildings that are much older than the Dallas City Hall.
New York City Hall courtesy of Wikimedia Commons, MusikAnimal.
New York City Hall is the oldest continuously operating city hall in America. It was finished in 1812 and is still the seat of government functions. The mayor’s office and city council chambers are here, as well as the staff of thirteen municipal agencies. It is one of the largest government buildings in the world, a National Historic Landmark, and on the National Register of Historic Places. In 2014, it underwent a comprehensive restoration and update, including updated mechanical systems, fire sprinklers, and sustainable elements for around $100 million.
Philadelphia City Hall, courtesy of Wikimedia Commons, Antoine Taveneaux.
Completed in 1901, Philadelphia City Hall is still the seat of government for the city and the largest municipal building in the United States. There have been continuous improvements conducted in phases over the years, including $6.85 million on exterior lighting in 2024, a $62 million preservation project in 2009, and a $26.5 million tower refurbishment in the late 1980s.
For the most relevant comparison, however, let’s look closely at Boston City Hall, a modern building more comparable to Dallas City Hall’s age and architectural significance.
Construction on Boston City Hall was completed in 1968, ten years before Dallas City Hall. It, too, is a brutalist design — done by the highly-lauded firm of Kallmann, McKinnell, and Knowles, who won a competition in 1962 to design it. The internationally recognized architect I.M Pei, who designed Dallas City Hall, also designed the Louvre Pyramid in Paris, the Bank of China Tower, the John F. Kennedy Presidential Museum and Library in Boston, the Museum of Islamic Art in Doha, Qatar, and our own Morton Myerson Symphony Hall and Fountain Place.
Boston city hall courtesy Wikimedia Commons ajay_suresh
Later, renovations and upgrades at Boston City Hall were done in phases, a sensible approach. The major renovations were completed in 2022 for $95 million. At the first public meeting at Dallas City Hall in late 2025, Alyx Scott presented insights from the Boston project and offered to share expertise with Dallas. Yet, it appears Dallas officials have not yet engaged the experts from the Boston project, so the most current expertise on a project that is extremely similar to Dallas City Hall may be untapped.
Boston City Hall and plaza courtesy Boston City Archives
“The new Boston City Hall Plaza recasts a monumental, brutalist open space into a verdant and inviting civic center in the heart of downtown Boston. For five decades, the plaza hosted Boston’s largest gatherings from sports celebrations to political rallies to seasonal cultural festivals, but it lacked human scale, offered limited amenities and was highly inaccessible. In partnership with city leadership and with the input of thousands of Bostonians, the renovated plaza is now a civic front yard where all are welcome.”
Saski Associates
Dallas City Hall
“We will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.”
Ada Louise Huxtable
So far, Dallas has had one rushed assessment on their “old” building. Several local preservation architects I spoke to said that a proper assessment of a building this size should take at least six months.
Historically, debates around architecturally significant civic buildings more often center on adaptation than demolition. It’s more on trend to discuss adapting or reimaging these buildings rather than destroying them. And other similar buildings have shown us that phased repairs and updates are the global norm. Just because our present and past city leaders have failed to budget for repairs and updates in a phased manner does not mean this building and its land should be sold to the highest bidder. It means we need leaders who have a broader worldview on the best practices that other large cities use in their civic architecture.
Internationally recognized architecture, regardless of age, creates a global identity and awareness. The work of I.M. Pei on Dallas City Hall is recognized worldwide. I’d argue it’s as much a part of the architectural fabric of our city as the Meyerson, Reunion Tower, and the Perot Museum of Nature and Science. As we consider the legacy and future of Dallas City Hall, let’s ensure that our decisions reflect both the significance of its global architectural stature and the responsibility we have to carry it forward for generations to come.
Thank you Karen!
Your comments are well researched and an accurate observation on the importance of the building.
Having lived in West Germany for a time, that dates me, I was amazed and in awe of the magnificent structures that were still in use after hundreds of years.
Nothing like that here. Time to start a trend of preservation that protects important structures for use now and into the future.
I appreciate the time and effort put into this article. I agree, Dallas City Hall is an icon and deserves to continue to be used for many years to come. I think everyone can agree that upgrades on a 47 year old building are definitely needed, but at the cost of a BILLION dollars is something that should be studied more.
Any city asset acquired or existing should have a required maintenance endowments in place.
City Councils for over 45 years have ignored the budgetary necessity.
This has to change!
1000%! If Dallas cannot maintain it’s real estate portfolio, then why does it own ANY property? This has been the impetus for ALL my city council runs! Dallas let the Kay Bailey Hutchison Convention Center rot, it let City Hall rot, it basically let’s every building it owns rot. Sell off every the every property and take care of the taxpayers, ALL taxpayers north to south!
Dolores Levy Serrokaon February 26, 2026 at 10:54 pm
Karen,
Thank you for pointing out the importance of a well thought out plan to ensure Dallas City Hall endures.
I do not understand the mentality that allows an iconic building to suffer from neglect. This needs to be rectify this by engaging independent experts to do a thorough assessment of the needed infrastructure restorations and necessary improvements.
The restoration of Dallas City Hall and/or Kay Bailey Hutchinson should not be determined or handled by the fools that have allowed it to become what it is! Look around the city. There are hundreds and hundreds of homes and buildings that are older which endure because they are maintained yearly and will probably be around for many more years because they taken care of!
The billion dollar estimate to restore it is another ploy by those who have year after year directed the money for restoration again to something THEY think is more important and will get them reelected.
They certainly are not qualified to make this kind of decision!
LOOK AT “BIG RED”!
Jerry, Of course I agree and at one point both Big Red and the School Book Depository were on the chopping block. Eight people should not be able to make an indrecibly rushed decision this important that affects this city for the rest of its existence. Ask your city council members WHY THE RUSH? WHAT ARE YOU HIDING? The lack of transparency is astonishing on this issue and should be illegal in my opinion
Great job Karen!!! Thanks for sharing!!! Wish the facts in your article could persuade those council members who are believing all the bogus numbers!!!
I agree on restoring Dallas City Hall. It is a Dallas Landmark and should be treated as such.
Please contact you city council member and let them know.
Thank you Karen!
Your comments are well researched and an accurate observation on the importance of the building.
Having lived in West Germany for a time, that dates me, I was amazed and in awe of the magnificent structures that were still in use after hundreds of years.
Nothing like that here. Time to start a trend of preservation that protects important structures for use now and into the future.
Thank you for this valuable perspective!!
I appreciate the time and effort put into this article. I agree, Dallas City Hall is an icon and deserves to continue to be used for many years to come. I think everyone can agree that upgrades on a 47 year old building are definitely needed, but at the cost of a BILLION dollars is something that should be studied more.
Thank you, Karen. Yet another thoughtful perspective that clearly illustrates the folly of abandoning Dallas City Hall.
You are so welcome Norman. Thanks for being a constant suporter of CandsyDirt and a great historic preservation mentor for us.
Any city asset acquired or existing should have a required maintenance endowments in place.
City Councils for over 45 years have ignored the budgetary necessity.
This has to change!
1000%! If Dallas cannot maintain it’s real estate portfolio, then why does it own ANY property? This has been the impetus for ALL my city council runs! Dallas let the Kay Bailey Hutchison Convention Center rot, it let City Hall rot, it basically let’s every building it owns rot. Sell off every the every property and take care of the taxpayers, ALL taxpayers north to south!
ABSOLUTELY!
Karen,
Thank you for pointing out the importance of a well thought out plan to ensure Dallas City Hall endures.
I do not understand the mentality that allows an iconic building to suffer from neglect. This needs to be rectify this by engaging independent experts to do a thorough assessment of the needed infrastructure restorations and necessary improvements.
Thank you. As a Dallas native, I applaud you for taking the time to research and write this article. Well done!
The restoration of Dallas City Hall and/or Kay Bailey Hutchinson should not be determined or handled by the fools that have allowed it to become what it is! Look around the city. There are hundreds and hundreds of homes and buildings that are older which endure because they are maintained yearly and will probably be around for many more years because they taken care of!
The billion dollar estimate to restore it is another ploy by those who have year after year directed the money for restoration again to something THEY think is more important and will get them reelected.
They certainly are not qualified to make this kind of decision!
LOOK AT “BIG RED”!
Jerry, Of course I agree and at one point both Big Red and the School Book Depository were on the chopping block. Eight people should not be able to make an indrecibly rushed decision this important that affects this city for the rest of its existence. Ask your city council members WHY THE RUSH? WHAT ARE YOU HIDING? The lack of transparency is astonishing on this issue and should be illegal in my opinion
Great job Karen!!! Thanks for sharing!!! Wish the facts in your article could persuade those council members who are believing all the bogus numbers!!!