Dallas Resident’s Legal Battle With City Involves a ‘Bogus Lien’ And Lee Harvey Oswald

Share News:

600 Elsbeth (Photo Credit: Benny Snyder/Associated Press via Houston Chronicle)

In 2007, Dallas resident Jane Bryant purchased a home on the corner of West Davis and North Elsbeth, about 100 yards from the Bishop Arts District. The former University of North Texas at Dallas professor had big plans to live there and operate her apparel business downstairs. 

She never got to live in the 1925 home — which she later learned had once been occupied by alleged JFK assassin Lee Harvey Oswald. She was blocked from attempts to renovate the home and rezone the land. She watched as it was demolished against her wishes in 2012. 

Jane Bryant

And now she can’t sell the land because the city has filed what Bryant calls a bogus lien charging her for asbestos removal and costs associated with the demolition.

“The title changed over to my name was barely dry and the city said, ‘Fix it or the building comes down. Renovate it within 30 days or the building comes down,’ and they sued me,” Bryant recalled. “The city started calling me and harassing me. They were trying to get me to renovate when there was no zoning. That’s just a dead-end deal. It’s crooked.” 

On top of all that, the 59-year-old has been battling leukemia for the past several years and lost some momentum in her attempts to sell the now-vacant land. 

Historic Home at 600 Elsbeth

At the time she purchased the Elsbeth home, Bryant was living in a duplex in University Park on Lovers Lane. 

Jane Bryant at 600 Elsbeth (Photo Credit: Benny Snyder/Associated Press via Houston Chronicle)

“I had an apparel business in addition to being a professor and doing consulting work,” she said. “I can’t do manufacturing in University Park. [The Elsbeth home] was ideal. I would have my manufacturing downstairs and I would live upstairs. You could do that over there; I think you still can with commercial zoning. I bought this property for a purpose, not just for my business, but I think there’s some historical value to it.”

When the city sued shortly after Bryant purchased the home from the Jurek family, the matter got tied up in Dallas Municipal Court. Almost 60 hearings were held, she said. The city alleged Bryant was negligent and refused to bring the building up to code. 

“They wanted me to redo it and I couldn’t do it without the zoning,” she said. “We just got into a constant battle where every week they were hauling me into court for something. They sued me to have it renovated then I’d have to get an attorney, which cost more money. I could never do anything with it.” 

Letter issued to Jane Bryant by the Dallas City Attorney’s Office, Jan. 23, 2020

Bryant said a lien was filed on the building “based on an inaccurate bill” sent in 2020, years after the demolition, claiming Bryant owed about $58,000 for the teardown, asbestos removal, and accrued interest. 

“I ask that the mayor and City Council recognize that the lien on the property is bogus and remove the lien,” Bryant wrote in a letter dated Aug. 9, 2021.

Interim City Attorney Tammy Palomino and Assistant City Attorney Kyle Paur — whose name is on the legal documents provided by Bryant — did not reply to requests for an interview. A spokeswoman for the City of Dallas said Friday that the City “does not have comment at this time.”

History of 600 Elsbeth 

According to Bryant and the research of some dogged local reporters, Oswald lived at 600 Elsbeth when he purchased the gun used to kill Dallas Police Officer J.D. Tippit on Nov. 22, 1963, about 45 minutes after the Kennedy assassination. 

Lee Harvey Oswald

“All of a sudden we found out this place had historical significance,” Bryant said. “I really wanted to save it, not just for my business, but it was a charming little building.” 

After the demolition, Bryant tried to sell and turned down offers from several developers, including an agent for a national drugstore chain. 

“The city took over the building and we had a gentleman’s agreement that they would give me sufficient time to tear down the building so we could save the architectural things,” she said. “They just kept stalling the teardown and then they said we violated our contract of bringing the building down in a timely fashion. They came in with bulldozers. They destroyed all the things I was trying to save.” 

Lien Reform 

Bryant, who now lives in a 100-year-old home on Swiss Avenue, said she fought with the city until she was out of resources. 

“I think people know I tried,” she said. 

Aug. 9, 2021, letter from Jane Bryant to Mayor Eric Johnson and the Dallas City Council

She recently hired Wichita Falls attorney Gant Grimes and said she wants the lien dropped. She still wants to sell the site at 600 Elsbeth, and she wants the city to change the way it does business with property owners. 

Bryant says her property appraisal has risen up to 500 percent. 

“I’m trapped,” she said. “That just increases their income. There’s the appraisal, the secret lien, the zoning, and all the different prices they’ve quoted me for teardown. What else can they do?”

She said she wants a jury trial over the lien so she can draw attention to what she characterizes as an unfair process. 

“The city should have an honest and fair lien approval or dismissal system,” she said. “The lien process is completely flawed and it is so important. That is the muscle. That is what they do to get people out of their homes. We’ve got to improve things for the next generation.”

Posted in

April Towery covers Dallas City Hall and is an assistant editor for CandysDirt.com. She studied journalism at Texas A&M University and has been an award-winning reporter and editor for more than 25 years.

3 Comments

  1. Pam on October 9, 2023 at 10:30 am

    Wow. Informative article. Boo to the city. Why would the city all of the sudden have interest in bull dozing a building when it was purchased and to require renovation within 30 days? That’s an unreasonable request! Would love to see a follow up to this on potential corruption in the city that is driving this.

  2. Donovan Lord on October 10, 2023 at 12:58 pm

    Typical city of Dallas. Always has been and always will be corrupt and crooked

  3. Bob on October 24, 2023 at 3:51 pm

    Jane is not being honest – there was no “Apparel business” in the works – she wanted to turn it into a multi-family unit in 2008, which isn’t allowed. She allowed the structure to languish until 2012 when the city finally stepped in because the structure was a danger and had OBVIOUSLY been abandoned since she couldn’t do what she wanted with it, based on Google streetview from 2008:

    June 2008 – BDA078-095. Application of Jane A. Bryant to request that the board restore a nonconforming use at 600 Elsbeth St. This property is more fully described as lot 1 in city block A/3367 and is zoned CS, which limits the legal uses in a zoning district and states that the right to operate a nonconforming use ceases if the nonconforming use is discontinued for six months or more. The board may grant a special exception to this provision only if the owner can show that there was a clear intent not to abandon the use even though the use was discontinued for six months or more. The applicant proposes to request that the board restore a nonconforming multifamily residential use.

    Do better research Candy’s Dirt. This stuff is all public information.

Leave a Comment