Lakewood Conservation Expansion Moves Forward, New Area Proposed to Include Monticello And Westlake

Share News:

Petitions are signed, and the Lakewood Conservation District is one step closer to including two additional neighborhoods

Conservation districts, which have existed in Dallas since 1988, are designed to help communities protect certain neighborhood characteristics.

Lakewood’s Historic Origins

Developers Albert Dines and Lee R. Kraft bought 184 acres in the 1920s around what is now Lakewood Country Club. 

The Country Club Estates neighborhood was built in 1923, and Monticello and Westlake were platted as separate developments shortly thereafter. When a conservation district was initiated in the late 1980s, it followed the boundaries for 323 homes in Country Club Estates. The expansion proposes that homes in the adjacent neighborhoods also be included. 

Summer Loveland lives in a historic Clifford Hutsell home in Lakewood and got nervous when she saw another for sale sign on a corner lot home built by the legendary Dallas architect. Not a single one of the 50 Hutsells in the area is in the protected, existing conservation district, Loveland said, but all are in the proposed expansion area. 

“I was concerned that the new owner might not see the value in the home but maybe look at it like, ‘How many square feet could I  put on this lot?’” she said. “We want to protect against the ramp-up of teardowns that have happened over the past year and a half, and we have a desire to keep the historic character of the neighborhood — that’s what people fall in love with when they move to Lakewood.”

There have been five teardowns in the last year and a half in a neighborhood that’s known for its historic, elegant architecture, Loveland added. 


7031 Tokalon Drive
A builder recently marketed this proposed design to replace the existing structure at 6832 Lakewood Blvd., which is in the proposed expansion area for the conservation district.

“That might not sound like a lot but there have only been 12 teardowns in the last 10 years,” she said. “It’s ramping up and it’s being driven by the increased value of our real estate and builders seeing the value of putting more square footage on our lots. Some of the new homes are towering over their neighbors’ homes. The materials are not as high quality; vinyl siding is being used. It doesn’t fit [the character of the neighborhood].”

David Preziosi, executive director of Preservation Dallas, wrote a letter of support for the expansion.

“Conservation District status is one of the best tools to help preserve neighborhood character while allowing changes to take place to historic structures in an appropriate manner to suit modern needs,” Preziosi wrote. “The criteria crafted for a Conservation District can be tailored to the needs and wants of neighborhood residents so that it is a tool that works for the benefit of the entire neighborhood.”

The Process 

Loveland called the city to find out what she could do to help preserve the neighborhood. A committee of 10 homeowners was formed and filed for determination of eligibility. Once that was approved, they began circulating petitions. They are required to get signatures from 58 percent of the owners of 275 homes in the affected area by June 27. They’ve done that, but continue to gather support and provide information to neighbors who have been out of town or have questions on what this means for their property. 

“The homeowners who are not signing, they are concerned that it could diminish their property value if they were to sell their home and it has any restriction on it,” Loveland said. “Realtors would disagree with that. It’s actually a way to help retain property values.” 

Images courtesy of Lakewood Conservation District Expansion Facebook page

Realtor Nancy Wilson, who lives in the existing Lakewood conservation district, said she’s “highly in favor of it or I wouldn’t live in it.”

“I’ve done an addition to my house, torn down a garage, torn windows out — and worked within the guidelines,” Wilson said. “From a homeowner’s perspective, I don’t see any negative issues. As a Realtor, I believe in maintaining architectural integrity. What’s appealing about Lakewood is it’s not a homogenous market. That’s one of the reasons people move here.” 

A typical one-story ranch home can become functionally obsolete when it’s nestled between two massive, towering homes with twice the square footage as the ranch. Then the ranch home loses value, Wilson explained. 

“It’s truly about maintaining architecture,” the Realtor said of the quest to expand the conservation district. “There’s nothing political about it.” 

What’s Next

The 10-person committee pursuing the conservation district will continue collecting signatures through June 27, then the city has 30 days to review and verify them. 

Dallas officials then schedule a series of at least four neighborhood meetings to determine what residents want to see in an ordinance. 

“As the city put it, now the fun part starts,” Loveland said. 

The city then takes the feedback, crafts an ordinance, and submits it to the Dallas Plan Commission. 

With the help of the new conservation ordinance and neighborhood support, Lakewood’s historic character will be preserved, Preziosi said.

“[It] is one of best areas of Dallas with its incredible collection of historic homes. We hope that the neighborhood will support the expansion of the Conservation District so that it will be protected well into the future and continue to be cherished for its historic charm,” he said.

Talking with neighbors and putting up yard signs in support of the conservation district has unified residents in the area, Loveland said. 

“Of course, there’s some opposition, but that feels minor in the grand scheme of the process,” she said.  

Neighbors will be able to give feedback, even if they’re out of town when the community meetings are held. Reply forms will be mailed out before the matter goes before the plan commission and city council so every neighbor can communicate their opinions and give feedback to the decision-making bodies. 

“I feel confident there’s going to be an ordinance and there will be an expansion area,” Loveland said. 

April Towery covers Dallas City Hall and is an assistant editor for CandysDirt.com. She studied journalism at Texas A&M University and has been an award-winning reporter and editor for more than 25 years.

5 Comments

  1. Bob McCranie on June 14, 2022 at 1:16 am

    It’s great that we’re preserving our history here in Dallas. Very important work

  2. Mike Starcher on June 14, 2022 at 4:29 am

    April,

    Thanks for the article it sparked a bunch of questions.
    1) Did you investigate the nature/quality of the 12 tear downs?
    2) Were the adjoining property owner’s values negatively impacted and if so by how much?
    3) Do you believe free markets eventually resolve problematic houses?
    4) Are you curious how the lines were drawn?
    5) do you live in a house in a conservation district?
    6) What positive/negative impacts have conservation districts had on University Park and Highland Park?
    7) Nancy Wilson wrote “What’s appealing about Lakewood is it’s not a homogenous market.” Did you consider this district will make it just that??
    8) Why do other people get to “lock in” the look of my house, trees, sidewalks, driveways, etc. for their own personal viewing pleasure if they’re not paying me for their enjoyment? Please think about this statement.
    9) If preserving value is the goal of this New District then shouldn’t we let the free markets take care of that?
    10) Houses in Lakewood are expensive. Do we not trust those capable of buying one are NOT capable of maintaining or enhancing their very own investment? Or should we let a Board of Ten make those decisions for the “not so smart homeowner”?

    When people say “it’s not political” it’s most likely political. The power bestowed on 10 board members to control how many homes is not political??

    Will you also ask the board members if the same resources the City will deploy “policing” our houses would be better served policing our streets?

    Thanks!

  3. Lakewoodie on June 15, 2022 at 8:43 am

    A very one-sided “pro-conservation” article. The previous comment presents some very good points. As a homeowner within the new proposed district, I am definitely opposed to any restrictions being placed on my rights to manage my property as I see fit.

    April. I hope you will present a follow-up article sharing opposing viewpoints.

  4. Rita Randolph on July 6, 2022 at 4:57 pm

    April –
    Here are a few things to consider
    -The New Lakewood Conservative district will be independent from the existing Lakewood Conservative District which was passed July 13 1988 and includes 323 homes. What is being proposed will be a New Lakewood Conservative District with 275 homes and will not change or impact the 323 homes in the Existing District. The city of Dallas officials made this clear at the meeting on May 23. Using the word Expansion seems a bit misleading if the rules for both areas will be different.
    -If the new district keeps with the framework of the existing ordinance the Architectural Style of your home will impact what you can or can not do. The following is a list of styles from the Existing District: Colonial Georgian Revival, French Eclectic, Spanish Eclectic, Tudor Style. If your home does not fit one of these styles you are classified a Non-Conforming structure. I do not support restricting this neighborhood to these four styles of homes. I agree with Nancy Wilson “What’s appealing about Lakewood is it’s not a homogenous market.
    -It is my understanding that putting addition restrictions on any property will reduce the market who will be willing to purchasing within a restricted area. I would suggest that you have additional real estate professionals chime in on this discussion.
    -Lakewood is a beautiful neighborhood and we support all our neighbors who make the neighborhood home in a historical structure or non conforming. We do not support further regulations.

  5. Kyle Brinkley on July 19, 2022 at 10:13 pm

    April,
    In the future it would be most effective to have an accurate article vs inaccurate speculation. I am a broker and concerned neighbor regarding respectful/positive conservation and development in Lakewood. The property you referenced at 6832 Lakewood Blvd at that time was completely inaccurate; another colleague of yours took the time to reach out to me for the accurate details. Regardless of your thoughts; yeh or neh; the facts should be accurate. Many neighbors who I talked to were excited about the project for the thoughtful significant renovation & restoration of a property that had been left ignored for several years. The developer I was working with no longer owns the property. Out of principal I want to set the record straight. This property included tearing off a very poorly done garage addition and then adding back on properly. It was going to receive a mortar smear over the brick so all could be blended together. The plans in place were conforming to the existing conservation guidelines.

    None of this is my fight as now another developer has taken control and I have no involvement. If we want positive preservation/change in the neighborhood owners should consider who they sell to.

Leave a Comment