Cole Avenue Lots Show How Dallas’ Wimpy Zoning Process Has Become A Selling Point

Share News:

Ad patter tells developers to build a high-rise, city a soft touch on rezoning.

Why is it so rare for Dallas to ever truly say “no” to developer-led upzoning? It always seems most often to be “yes, but …” And while I’m all for a good negotiation, if you enter a negotiation where the other side knows you’re unlikely to really say “no,” then it’s not really a negotiation, is it?

And when the real estate community understands they can’t really lose, it’s dangerous for residents who have to live with the outcome. We expect elected and appointed leaders to say “no” sometimes.

$13 Million An Acre – No Mule

Enter 4011, 4021, 4031, 4033, and 4039 Cole Avenue. It’s a 2.09-acre site across from Cole Park north of Cambrick Street that encompasses 40 two-story condos and two smaller apartment buildings. The lots are bracketed by 1999’s Cambrick townhouses and the 1976 Esplanade Condos. The area is zoned MF-2 limiting heights to 36-feet.

The Cole properties for sale are 1960s apartments-turned-condos that rarely break 1,000 square feet and $200,000 in assessed value (or roughly $8 million in total). So why is this land priced at $27,300,000 or roughly $13 million an acre?

Let’s see what listing agent Logan Waller of Waller Group Properties has to say …

“The existing zoning is MF-2, however multiple comparable sites in the area have successfully rezoned for planned development zoning. This would allow a developer to achieve the highest and best usage for the land and optimize the site with a 20+ story luxury multifamily or luxury condo development.”

What’s the playbook to upzone?  Waller tells prospects …

“The city of Dallas will likely grant this zoning change with 10% of developed units set aside for affordable housing (80% of area median income).”

“The city would also likely grant the zoning change with parking variances as well due to proximity (0.6 miles) to City Place DART station (Dallas Area Rapid transportation).”

I was shocked by the brazenness of Waller’s “shop window” but I don’t think he’s inaccurate.

Setting Precedent

I often hear city representatives say that zoning cases stand alone and that precedent is pretty irrelevant to their judgements. If that’s true, why is it part of so many winning strategies?

Lincoln Katy Trail presents their precedents that include the nearby Post Katy Trail and the high-rise Taylor buildings. Thing is, all of their “precedent” buildings were built by-right, having had zoning rights that predated the 1983 founding of the Oak lawn Committee and its PD-193. So, yes, they’re oversize in an MF-2 area, but there was no stopping them as they didn’t require a zoning case.

But let’s return to Waller, who rips off the Band-Aid:

“Precedent has been set for these zoning changes north and south of the site, most recently and notably the Broadstone Cole on 4444 Cole Ave (0.5 miles from subject site). Previously MF-2 zoning, developer achieved full entitlements within 12 months. This 333-unit luxury multifamily project is scheduled for completion in early 2022.”

What Waller failed to say is that the Broadstone, while upzoned, isn’t a 20-plus story high-rise. In fact, a high-rise was proposed twice but was shut-down at the Oak Lawn Committee.

4031 Cole Avenue’s DCAD History: Note the 2014-2015 10x change

The City is a Pushover; DCAD Harder to Fool

So, how does it feel City Plan Commission and Dallas City Council to have your playbook so blithely and assuredly marketed as a soft touch to developers? Essentially Cole Avenue prospects are being told, “Sure, you’ll have to give a little affordable but you can skimp on parking because you’re technically considered a transit-oriented development.” Oh, and you should be able to accomplish your upzoning in under a year.

But it’s not just developers who know. In 2014 and 2015, both the smaller Cole properties were purchased by Viceroy Living LLC. Pre-2014 sale, DCAD valued 4031 Cole’s land at $5 per square foot. The following year it increased to $50 per square foot and today is assessed at $105 per foot – in five years (the same $105 as the already redeveloped townhouses next door). The smaller property’s land values have more than doubled since its sale a year later to $105 per foot.

The asking price for the lots today values them at $300 per square foot because they’re not building no stinking townhouses.

DCAD is far, far from perfect. For example, look at Mansion Park (area in back of The Mansion on Turtle Creek) where un-redeveloped land is valued at $85 per square foot – even though it’s already zoned MF-3 with unlimited height. For reference, the high-rise Plaza condos land is valued at $125 per foot yet The Mansion Residences land is only valued at $110 per foot (so it’s not all brains over at DCAD).

Why Upzone?

Upzoning is a more difficult and uncertain process in Dallas’ suburbs and Mid-cities (unless it’s for a stadium) – it’s next to impossible in the Park Cities. I mean, imagine if Highland Park Village wanted to swap swanky boutiques for a couple of high-rises?

The reason to upzone in Dallas is economic.  There is a ton of property already zoned for high-rises. To name a few, there’s all of downtown, the aforementioned Mansion Park area and in Uptown, blocks from the Cole Avenue properties there is the swath of land between the Lemmon Avenues from the Katy Trail to Central all zoned for 240-foot heights.

The problem is that those property owners know what those rights are worth (but I hear some are complaining the city’s easy upzoning makes their land worth less). Non-high-rise property owners don’t understand the economics. So they sell for less.

Let’s say high-rise zoned land would cost $1. Developers and investors might pick-up a good candidate to upzone for $0.65 and spend another $0.10-0.15 getting it rezoned. At $0.75-0.80 all in, that’s a 20-25 percent discount handed out free by the city representing millions of dollars in rights.

After springing for some scraps of affordable housing (a fraction of the number they’ll bulldoze), developers cry all the way to the bank.

Without the whole story, Plan Commission and Council can’t make best decision

15 Blind Mice

A lot of the time, these deals are struck with eyes wide open, but sometimes Plan Commission and Council are blinded to what’s up. Take Crescent Communities’ Novel Turtle Creek.  The city didn’t require Crescent and AT&T to tell them why the parcel was being re-platted (in fact, Plan Commissioners told me they are barred from seeing/asking about plans in such cases).

Who knows, the city may have acted differently had they known they were approving a 20-story high-rise obscured when the lots were re-platted to enable it. Other municipalities would have required they spill the beans on the re-plat – not Dallas.

Posted in

Jon Anderson is CandysDirt.com's condo/HOA and developer columnist, but also covers second home trends on SecondShelters.com. An award-winning columnist, Jon has earned silver and bronze awards for his columns from the National Association of Real Estate Editors in both 2016, 2017 and 2018. When he isn't in Hawaii, Jon enjoys life in the sky in Dallas.

14 Comments

  1. CRITIC on January 19, 2021 at 8:28 am

    And the typical Dart rider is going to live in a $2500 per month new apartment on Cole Avenue???

  2. Stephanie Kelley on January 19, 2021 at 11:06 am

    You can do better than the reference to ‘Forty Acres and a Mule’. Found it insulting. Just in case copying a Wikipedia link to give you a short reference as to what ‘Forty Acres and a Mule’ references and meant to the Black Slaves that were promised this land and a mule. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forty_acres_and_a_mule

    • renato on January 19, 2021 at 7:36 pm

      Suggest you repair to your master bedroom and get over it.

    • Jon Anderson on January 19, 2021 at 8:03 pm

      No offense was intended and I appreciate the education. I always thought that “40 acres and a mule” was what anyone got who was expanding/homesteading during the westward expansion.

      Coincidentally, I was wondering this evening as I walked if “calling a spade a spade” was racial or or if it was of playing card origin. So I looked it up and it was Plutarch who seems to have originated the idiom that ultimately referred to the gardening implement.

  3. Thomas Rivington on January 19, 2021 at 1:56 pm

    Another very good article, Mr. Anderson.

    How do you see this playing out? Under Texas state law, as affirmed by numerous state court decisions, official area plans (such as the Oak Lawn Plan), and the comprehensive plan (forwardDallas!), place numerous constraints upon the ability of CPC and City Council to approve zoning modifications which blatantly violate their officially adopted zoning and land use plans. Also, it seems counterintuitive that the City Council would use its affordable housing policy to justify the award of millions of high density development rights valued in the millions of dollars to a developer whose stated intent is to bulldoze existing affordable housing and destablize an existing mixed income neighborhood., leading to increased segregation.

    Even if CPC and City Council were to approve such a plan, wouldn’t residents be able to have the rezoning set aside by the courts since the new zoning would be in direct violation of officially-approved plans and policies?

  4. Kathy on January 19, 2021 at 6:58 pm

    I can relate. Try living in the Southern sector where warehouses seem to be the only development the city can muster. The last undeveloped area in the city is being over populated with truck trailers and massive concrete boxes.

  5. Blaine Kesach on January 21, 2021 at 9:47 am

    Why would the city bulldoze this existing, stable mixed-income neighborhood to build high-rise luxury apartments when plenty of high-rise development sites are already available along Lemmon Ave, McKinney and Fitzhugh?

    Why would the city want to make the affordable housing crisis worse by attacking existing neighborhoods and displacing residents?

    Why would the city effectively bomb this stable neighborhood and simply handover high density development rights worth in the millions of dollars without getting anything in return?
    This doesn’t make sense.

    • Jon Anderson on January 21, 2021 at 2:21 pm

      So far this is just sales patter. Who knows what the city would do when presented with a high-rise in this location. If you live in the neighborhood, stay close to news of any sale and plans.

  6. Sam on January 23, 2021 at 1:45 pm

    I would think a buyer would make rezoning a condition to closing; I believe this is fairly common with developers. Seems like the buyer would be taking a lot of risk (or, shall I say, too much) otherwise. But, then again, RE developers are not known to be a risk averse bunch.

    • Jon Anderson on January 23, 2021 at 2:19 pm

      Yes, most buyers would predicate a deal closing with city approval of plans. Sometimes they buy and roll the dice. I find developers and especially their financiers are very risk-averse. The reason development stalls is the availability of money. 2020 dried up a lot of money sources.

  7. Secret in the Dirt on January 25, 2021 at 3:59 pm

    Good reporting Jon! These are the kind or articles I look forward to most on this site: a real estate story situated within the context of social policies, history, human interest, and politics. Thank you for posting.

    PS: hope you are enjoying your new penthouse.

  8. Andrew on January 26, 2021 at 12:56 pm

    How do we give more teeth to the zoning process?

    What changes in the process, ordinances, laws etc. need to happen to make it better and give the process more teeth? Is it a matter of city council passing ordinances that have teeth or is it a matter of existing ordinances not being enforced? If the former then how does average Dallas resident effectively lobby for new ordinances? If the latter then how can the proper people/entities be compelled to enforce existing ordinances? Also, is it lack of resources [people/money] or lack lack of will [among city staff / council]?

    • Jon Anderson on January 26, 2021 at 1:01 pm

      I think the process is OK on paper. What you need is the will by the city to stop being such an easy touch. Certainly strengthened ordinances help, but they can be overridden at city hall. As residents, we must all stay close to nearby zoning cases (which is a mild pain).

      • Andrew on January 26, 2021 at 3:03 pm

        Thanks, Jon, and thanks for helping so many of us stay closer to these zoning cases than we may otherwise be able to by covering them as you do. I know I appreciate it.

Leave a Comment