Citizens Police Review Board Meeting in North Dallas Contentious, Policed by Police
Share News:
We know the City of Dallas is aiming to strengthen its Citizens Police Review Board, the entity which examines alleged inappropriate police behavior within the Dallas Police Department against citizens.
In fact, I am fairly certain this is a done deal and will happen within the next two to three months.
In fact, we were told that Dallas has far fewer complaints against police than other cities of similar size, which the board said was because many people in Dallas are afraid to say anything negative about police. (I’m told that up until now, there has not even been a form to fill out.) Some at the meeting didn’t know the board even existed. The CPRB representative, Paul Hille, filling in for chair Dr. Brian Williams (appointed by Mayor Rawlings), had to explain to the large, mostly police friendly group, that not everyone considers the police friendly.
I daresay a vote for police pay raises in this group would have been a slam-dunk.
The meeting was well-policed, including the presence of Police Chief U. Renee Hall. Gateway Church offered a generous smorgasbord of sandwiches, cookies, water, and iced tea. (At earlier meetings in other districts I’m told wine was even served.) The furniture in the giant room was arranged cafe-style, seating four to a table, and most of us sat on sofas to evoke the feeling we were not at a contentious meeting but perhaps a dinner theater. One of the officers told me that Gateway’s coordinator has a degree in psychology and placed the furniture purposefully so as to provide a calming atmosphere and ordered food for full bellies.
How it works now: the Citizens Review Board, appointed by the City Council, makes recommendations on police investigations and checks that complaints have been handled properly. The proposed changes would give the review board investigative powers, a budget, the authority to subpoena officers, and the power to overrule police Internal Affairs investigations. The current board cannot subpoena officers. So, if an officer is involved in some sort of on-the-job misconduct, inappropriate use-of-force situation, or shooting, the current board cannot conduct its own independent investigation of the incident.
There were two main crescendos during the one hour presentation, after which many residents asked questions, voiced concerns, for another hour and a half:
One young man called attention to the fact that he was black, while most of the people in the room were not. As he began, his speech was initially met by boos until a North Dallas DPD reminded us of decorum and said that anyone shouting out when it wasn’t their turn to speak — which had been happening — would be escorted out by DPD.
The young man continued that black people have been unfairly targeted by police for killing, evoking the recent shooting death of a black man (Botham Jean) in his own home by a Dallas police officer. He said something to the effect of, this is why there is a need for this board (whether you realize it or not), you may not be willing to do something about it, but in fact, the black community is going to do something about it whether you like it or not.
The next crescendo came when the family of the late attorney Ira Tobolowsky spoke, basically detailing how the Dallas Police had botched evidence in the murder of their loved one to the extent that there was now no evidence to convict the suspected murderer. Reading from a three-page hand-typed letter, Mr. Tobolowsky’s relative made a clear case for a mess up of major proportions that began the moment police and fire were called to the scene of the crime in May 2016, at the Janmar home in North Dallas. Those of us listening gasped in horror as the speaker detailed how the family appealed to not one but two police chiefs, David Brown and now Chief Hall: nothing.
Later, another woman, whose black son had been killed by police, explained how unfairly targeted black victims’ families feel. Realtor and activist Diane Benjamin detailed how she had been robbed in her driveway but police were there within minutes . (Diane was vehemently opposed to the stronger board and the community groups supporting it.) Another young woman gave details of being mugged in her North Dallas driveway and enduring a 40-minute wait for police, this quite recently.
In between those testimonies, most in the vast room were supportive of police, were angered by the understaffing of the department, inadequate police pay compared to neighboring cities, and the overwhelming burdens that our society has tasked police with: being a social worker, a psychologist, a parent, law enforcement officer.
And, as we saw in the room, enforcer of civility.
By the way, do the neighboring communities who snap up our trained officers have strong police review boards? City comparisons that were made: San Jose, Austin, Denver and Detroit.
The stronger board would be able to subpoena officers, create an independent investigative arm, implement police policy, and conduct external investigations of complaints from the public to ultimately make recommendations for discipline against officers. Appointees to the board would be “qualified individuals”. I learned that current members of the board are mostly male, many are attorneys or have background in law enforcement.
But as District 11 resident Bill Caruth pointed out, decisions about policing would be made by a lay panel, individuals with no training in police procedures: not good. Another suggested that because appointments to the stronger board would come from Council persons, it could get political. Another suggested implementing a smaller scale version first: baby steps.
The call for a stronger board originated with City Manager T.C. Broadnax and Dallas Police Chief Reneé Hall in 2017, as they met with a coalition of community groups (Dallas Community Police Oversight Coalition) voicing anger and concern over police behavior. It hit crisis proportions with the death of Botham Jean last September, the young black man shot in his home by former Dallas police office Amber Guyer.
The cost: less than Detroit, about the same as Austin or San Jose
The speakers could not tell me that a stronger board would reduce the lawsuits against the city, currently 38, nor lower that $11.5 millions in settlement costs
The coalition recommended that citizens have a way to file complaints about officers online and in-person, which now can be done on the DPD website.
But the coalition felt true strength would come from citizenry subpoena and investigative powers, and the power to override police Internal Affairs investigations and outcomes. And that is the part that concerned most citizens at Tuesday night’s meetings.
Best comment of the evening came from a West Texas man who said he was of Indian origin, hence a member of “the originally mistreated American population”. He said he had always been respectful when stopped by police as a young man. Therefore he had never had problems with police. He said he was concerned with the lack of respect in society for police in effect, and he asked why it wasn’t possible to overlook what was “PC” and work together for the good of America. He voiced concern that if society continues to thrash police, we may have fewer left… as is the clear case in the city of Dallas right now.
Though the evening was late, and everyone may have wanted to go home, the applause for his comment might have been loudest.
6 Comments
Leave a Comment
Amber Guyger is charged with murder, right? What else would the review board have recommended? We have an ELECTED District Attorney whose job includes investigating and charging police who have violated the law.
You forgot to mention that attendees were called racist (several times) white supremacists.
What shall I say? Let me count the ways? Redundancy? Political obfuscation? The big unspoken classic: reverse racism? The undermining of IAD investigations? Oh btw the 6th floor has been undermining objective investigations for years so in reality this is no big deal? Usurping the commands ability to lead its troops? “But soft, what light through yonder window breaks? It is the east and Chief Uhaul thinks she is the sun.” Uhaul has already compromised her department … C est la vie. And on and in it goes until you no longer have a police department … you have a well compromised and regulated uniformed beat down unable to fulfill their peace officer function group of call answerers without motivation or a will to step-up. Long Live The Glorious Few Who Are Informed and Imbued with Sanctimonious Intentions; for they shall inherit the decimations and candidly so! What say ye Nero Rawlings?
Thanks fo covering this!! I think this dialogue, whether contentious or not, is good for the city. More of them are needed. I am a longtime activist on policing and criminal justice reform and one of the founders of the Dallas Community Police Oversight Coalition. Just wanted to clear a few things up:
1. The current review board actually has subpoena power right now. In almost 40 years they have not been able to use it because of the level of beauracracy it takes to make it happen.
2. The plan for a new oversight board does not override investigative processes or power of DPD. It does however give the board the power to make recoemmenadations and have a window into the Internal Affairs investigative process before they make a final decision.
3. This takes nothing away from current DPD resources or budget.
WRONG, in the included PowerPoint it clearly states that committee will have investigative power AND can override the IAD investigation!
While we are on the subject, it also states that the committee would have access to police data to look for opportunities to implement “policies and practices to improve policing”. How will a group of people that have never been a police officer be able to tell a police department how to do it’s job better? When a surgeon makes mistakes, a review panel is a group of surgeons… the BAR Associatio, lawyers, reviews the actions of lawyers… Policing is the only profession where lay people are awarded the opportunity to tell the officers that they did wrong… why is that?
WRONG, in the included PowerPoint it clearly states that committee will have investigative power AND can override the IAD investigation!
While we are on the subject, it also states that the committee would have access to police data to look for opportunities to implement “policies and practices to improve policing”. How will a group of people that have never been a police officer be able to tell a police department how to do it’s job better? When a surgeon makes mistakes, a review panel is a group of surgeons… the BAR Associatio, lawyers, reviews the actions of lawyers… Policing is the only profession where lay people are awarded the opportunity to tell the officers that they did wrong… why is that?
Policed by police is incorrect. Police are attending to monitor another attempt to hamstring their job performance. This is straight out of Obama administration 2015 Final Report on 21st Century Policing, implemented in police chief Hall’s Detroit from where she hails. (Google that.) Fomented hatred of police and spawned Black Lives Matter movement. We have due process for the very few police officers who abuse their power. Unelected boards do not need subpoena powers and $1.5 MM in taxpayer funds. But please attend the Public Safety committee meeting on Feb 11 at 11am at City Hall to voice your opinion. This is the same Police Chief and City Mgr who allowed our Juvenile Curfew to expire to encourage kids to roam the streets between 12am and 6am because the curfew is “racist”.